Cases 31 - 40 of 13,024
Richter v. Hatfield, et al
as 24-5084
Defendant:
ROBIN HATFIELD, JESSICA PITTS, AARIKA HOLT and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN D. RICHTER, Administrator of the Estate of Xander Cage Harris-Bruntmyer
Silva v. Lynch et al
as 1:2024cv06892
Plaintiff:
Nathan Silva
Defendant:
C. David Brown, J. Scott Kirby, CVS Health Corportation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 j(b)ss Stockholder Suit
Morris v. Schmitt
as 4:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Nathan Morris
Defendant:
Jessica Schmitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367 Other Property Damage
Leuthold v. Wills
as 1:2024cv01323
Respondent:
Anthony Wills
Petitioner:
Nathan A Leuthold
Unknown:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frye v. Wilson et al
as 3:2024cv00641
Plaintiff:
Devon Frye
Defendant:
Jason Wilson, Nathan Moore and Santa Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll v. Kilgore
as 7:2024cv00620
Defendant:
Major Nathan George Kilgore
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wayne Carroll, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NATHAN LITTAUER HOSPITAL v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv02052
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Plaintiff:
Nathan Littauer Hospital
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Byerly v. State of Idaho, et al.
as 1:2024cv00418
Defendant:
Klinton R. Hust, Josh Tewalt, T. Valley and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Byerly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byerly v. State of Idaho, et al.
as 1:2024cv00416
Defendant:
John Doe Bobiner, T. Valley, Klinton R. Hust and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Byerly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Braun v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2024cv03596
Defendant:
Kathleen Reuter, Jaqueline Cross, Sam Dougless and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Christopher Braun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
