Cases 31 - 40 of 76
Bedolla v. EMH Logistics, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02048
Defendant:
EMH Logistics, Inc. and Ronald Harris
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Bedolla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Espinosa v. Harris et al
as 7:2017cv06209
Plaintiff:
Brandon Espinosa
Defendant:
Ronald Harris , Rossmeyer & Weber Inc. and Raritan Valley Bus Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harris et al v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC f/k/a JOHNSON AND JOHNSON PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LLC et al
as 2:2016cv14209
Plaintiff:
Charisse Harris and Ronald Harris
Defendant:
JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC f/k/a JOHNSON AND JOHNSON PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. f/k/a JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC. f/k/a ORTHO-MCNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Ronald Harris
as 16-3003
Petitioner:
In re: RONALD HARRIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Ronald Harris
as 16-2948
Petitioner:
In re: RONALD HARRIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
HARRIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03215
Plaintiff:
RONALD HARRIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
In re: Ronald Harri
as 16-2429
Petitioner:
In re: RONALD HARRIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Clay v. Harris et al
as 1:2016cv05099
Plaintiff:
Shawn Clay
Defendant:
Ronald Harris, Thomas, P. Ziecik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Harris v. Robert Langley, et al
as 15-3861
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RONALD HARRIS
Defendant:
ROBERT LANGLEY, Individually and as an Employee of the Cleveland Police Department, PATRICK PETRANEK, Individually and as an Employee of the Cleveland Police Department, CLEVELAND POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DOMINIK PENDLETON, Individually and as an Employee of the Cleveland Police Department
Harris v. Michigan Parole Board
as 2:2015cv12058
Plaintiff:
Ronald Harris
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
