Cases 31 - 40 of 142
Doyle v. Broward County Sheriff et al
as 0:2017cv62050
Plaintiff:
Robert Doyle
Defendant:
Broward County Sheriff, Broward County Clerk of Courts, Winston R. Blackman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv07561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hawes v. Doyle
as 3:2017cv05598
Plaintiff:
Terry R. Hawes
Defendant:
Robert Doyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Josh Thomas v. Brian Roberts, et al
as 17-16363
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSH THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN ROBERTS, EDWARD MARTINEZ, ROBERT DOYLE and others
Murphy v. Brown et al
as 6:2017cv00218
Defendant:
Kate Brown, Patty Cress, Leslie Farerra and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Doyle Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Addesso et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia et al
as 1:2016cv09937
Plaintiff:
Caron Addesso , Jorge Alban , Sandy Alberto and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Saudi Binladin Group, Mohamed Binladin Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doyle v. Mastercard International Incor
as 16-4270
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Doyle, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant - Appellee:
Mastercard International Incorporated
Rohl #783996 v. Immel et al
as 2:2016cv00176
Plaintiff:
Robert Doyle Rohl #783996
Defendant:
Matt Immel, Ron Harris, Unknown O'Neill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Roberts et al
as 2:2016cv00724
Plaintiff:
Josh Thomas
Defendant:
Brian Roberts, Edward Martinez, Robert Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doyle v. Janssen Research & Development LLC, et al
as 2:2016cv02669
Plaintiff:
Robert Doyle
Defendant:
Bayer AG, Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
