Cases 31 - 40 of 141
Ayesha v. Hussain et al
as 2:2022cv02284
Plaintiff:
Noor Ayesha
Defendant:
Ahmed Hussain, Nasreej Taj, Perveez Hussain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Banu et al v. United States Department of State et al
as 3:2022cv00606
Plaintiff:
Shamima Banu, Enamul Maqsud, Sabera Sultana and others
Defendant:
United States Department of State, U.S. Embassy, Dhaka, Bangladesh, Antony Blinken and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Shaw v. Wasko et al
as 4:2022cv04054
Plaintiff:
James Elmer Shaw
Defendant:
Kelly Wasko, Dan Sullivan, Brent Fluke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
RAHMAN et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2022cv00631
Plaintiff:
MAHBUBUR S RAHMAN, SAYDA MAHABUBA SULTANA, SAYDA TAJRUBA SULTANA and others
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, HELEN LAFAVE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ellis et al v. Logistics Hospitality LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
Ashley Ellis, Amanda Harjo and Dallas Harjo
Defendant:
Logistics Hospitality LLC formerly doing business as Ramada Inn (Pueblo), Nahid Sultana and Rush Hossein
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
