Cases 31 - 40 of 146
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 3.3921 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS et al
as 7:2020cv00317
Defendant:
STARR COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR, LIVE OAK EDINBURG, LLC, IDALIA PAULA SILVA RUIZ and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Moore v. Texas Workforce Commission
as 2:2020cv00046
Plaintiff:
Wade Lee Moore
Defendant:
Texas Workforce Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422
Boyd v. Texas Workforce et al
as 3:2019cv02375
Defendant:
Jennifer Quintanilla, Texas Workforce and Roxanne Lujan
Plaintiff:
Richard Shelton Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Texas Workforce Commission v. United States Dept of Educ
as 19-50283
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, REHABILITATION SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01031
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doerr v. Texas Workforce Commission/General Counsel
as 6:2018cv00257
Plaintiff:
Magnolia E. Doerr
Defendant:
Texas Workforce Commission/General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104
Pogue v. Texas Workforce Commission et al
as 1:2018cv00713
Defendant:
Hearing Officer Robert Dwyer, Jr., Texas Workforce Commission and Christopher Oakley
Plaintiff:
Ethel Venice Pogue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Austin v. Ken Paxton, et al
as 18-50646
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CITY OF AUSTIN
Defendant - Appellant:
KEN PAXTON, Attorney General of the State of Texas and TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION
United States of America v. Chapa et al
as 4:2018cv00199
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Joe Chapa, Elsa Chapa, Busy Bee General Contractor, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Malone v. Texas Workforce Commission
as 4:2018mc00719
Plaintiff:
Monitrice Y Malone
Defendant:
Texas Workforce Commission
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
