Cases 31 - 40 of 352
Gresham v. Sanford et al
as 1:2023cv01098
Plaintiff:
Clay Thomas Gresham
Defendant:
Nurse Kasey Sanford, Dr. Deanna Hopson, C.O. Tibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tibbs et al v. Arlo Technologies, Inc.
as 5:2023cv05096
Plaintiff:
Casey Tibbs, Andrew Castillo and Eric Wilim
Defendant:
Arlo Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
TIBBS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv04546
Plaintiff:
JAMES WAYNE TIBBS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Simons v. North Central Regional Jail et al
as 3:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Gary Lynn Simons
Defendant:
North Central Regional Jail, Capt. Sams, Lt. Tibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClendon v. Tibbs et al
as 2:2023cv00709
Plaintiff:
Calvin McClendon
Defendant:
Lieutenant Timothy Tibbs, Superintendent Jason Hutson, Steve Caudill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Eakle v. Timothy Tibbs
as 23-6854
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID EAKLE
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY TIBBS, MICHAEL COSTELLO, SHANNON SAMS and others
Ryan Francisco v. Timothy Tibbs
as 23-6850
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN FRANCISCO
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY TIBBS, MICHAEL COSTELLO, SHANNON SAMS and others
Falcon Owens v. Timothy Tibbs
as 23-6855
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FALCON OWENS
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY TIBBS, MICHAEL COSTELLO, SHANNON SAMS and others
In re: Tibbs v. Electrocore, Inc, et al
as 23-2655
Petitioner / Appellant:
In re: CAROLE TIBBS
Defendant / Appellee:
ELECTROCORE INC, FRANCIS R. AMATO, GLENN S. VRANIAK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
