Cases 31 - 40 of 12,837
Hargis v. USA
as 5:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
William Ray Hargis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Forte v. North Point Training Center et al
as 5:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Montrail Forte
Defendant:
North Point Training Center, The State of Kentucky, Officer Chad Shearer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Poling v. USA
as 3:2024cv00227
Petitioner:
Randol Allen Poling, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Perkins v. Dallam et al
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Gavin Perkins
Defendant:
Ramsey Dallam, Steve Conrad, Detective Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Cook et al
as 5:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Cindy Mitchell
Defendant:
Detective Dylan Cook, Detective Beau Green and Sgt. Matthew Scheer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
McNichols v. Hatton et al
as 5:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Charles R. McNichols
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Chris Hatton, Captain Zackary Eubanks, Warden Bobbi Jo Butts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNichols v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Charles R. McNichols
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, Bobbi Jo Butts, Chris Hatton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Warden FCI Ashland
as 0:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
Jonathan Martinez
Respondent:
Warden FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bailey v. Jones et al
as 0:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Scott Bailey
Defendant:
Brandon Jones, Nathan Conley and Wesley Coldiron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. USA
as 5:2024cv00061
Petitioner:
Reginald R. Thomas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
