Cases 31 - 40 of 10,102
Detherage v. Triplett et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Joshua Detherage
Defendant:
John E. Triplett and Elizabeth N. Slater
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Garmon
as 4:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Ms. Christopher Lowe
Defendant:
Unit Manager Garmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. United States Of America
as 4:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Darryl Washington
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Simpson v. Harmon et al
as 3:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Gregory Simpson
Defendant:
Investigator Harmon and Ms. Flemming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALSTON v. COASTAL STATE PRISON et al
as 4:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Dennis Alston
Defendant:
Coastal State Prison, JOHN AND OR JANE DOE and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockhart v. Mims
as 1:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
Shawn Lockhart
Respondent:
Warden Charles Mims
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grable v. Oliver et al
as 3:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Felenthean Grable
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Andrew McFarlane and Veronica Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Vlasenko
as 4:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Morieo Austin
Defendant:
Dr. Vlasenko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wishon v. Jackson G.D.C.P.
as 4:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Seth Axley Wishon
Defendant:
Jackson G.D.C.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Warden Perry
as 4:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
Willie C. Phelps
Respondent:
Warden Perry
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
