Cases 41 - 50 of 946
Winston v. Keithley et al
as 4:2023cv04208
Plaintiff:
Andre Winston
Defendant:
Tracy Keithley, A Hoyt, S Jumper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks et al v. Illinois American Water Company
as 3:2023cv03673
Plaintiff:
Tracy Brooks and Sean Thomas
Defendant:
Illinois American Water Company
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA: Family and Medical Leave Act (Findings and Purposes)
Hood v. Truhlar et al
as 1:2023cv15591
Plaintiff:
Austin Darnell Hood
Defendant:
Officer Truhlar, Tracy S. Chapman and Will County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Mishra et al v. Blinken et al
as 1:2023cv15538
Plaintiff:
Kajali Mishra and Tarun Jain
Defendant:
Antony Blinken, Director UR M JADDOU, Tracy Tarango and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Lipscomb v. Joyner et al
as 1:2023cv01401
Plaintiff:
Keon Lipscomb
Defendant:
Tracy Joyner, Anton Frazier, . Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. GTL et al
as 1:2023cv01399
Plaintiff:
Keon Lipscomb
Defendant:
GTL, Rob Jeffreys, Tracy Joyner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Williams
as 4:2023cv04179
Petitioner:
Tracy E. Johnson
Respondent:
Tarry Williams
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Williams
as 3:2023cv50367
Petitioner:
Tracy E. Johnson
Respondent:
Tarry Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
