Cases 41 - 50 of 60
NEAL v. PARKER, et al
as 5:2015cv00071
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALLEN NEAL
Defendant:
PARKER , OSVALDO CONTARINI, A HATTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hatton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2014cv02391
Petitioner:
Roland Blake Hatton
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hatton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2014cv02028
Plaintiff:
Mary A. Hatton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Catlin Insurance Company, Inc. v. P&S Agricultural Services, LLC et al
as 9:2013cv80540
Plaintiff:
Catlin Insurance Company, Inc.
Defendant:
P&S Agricultural Services, LLC, Robert C. Hatton, Inc. and Integrity Farms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Hatton v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company, LLC
as 8:2012cv02158
Plaintiff:
Jason Robert Hatton
Defendant:
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688 Jones Act
Hatton v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 8:2012cv01119
Plaintiff:
Evalina Hatton
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Woolum v. Administrators at Brevard County Jail et al
as 6:2012cv00534
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Woolum
Defendant:
Administrators at Brevard County Jail, Brad Burnette, Gregory Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatton et al v. Chrysler Canada, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00186
Defendant:
Chrysler Canada, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carolina Hatton and C.H.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WHITNEY BANK v. HATTON et al
as 3:2011cv00595
Plaintiff:
WHITNEY BANK
Defendant:
MICHAEL H HATTON and LYNDA F HATTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
