Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Bose Corporation v. Meyerer et al
as 1:2010cv10498
Plaintiff:
Bose Corporation
Defendant:
John Meyerer, Nikolaos Kridzelis, Kevin Longley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Costar Partners, LP v. Ritz Asia, Inc., d/b/a Buddachen and Shun Li Chen
as 1:2010cv10448
Plaintiff:
Costar Partners, LP
Defendant:
Ritz Asia, Inc. and Shun Li Chen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv10091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
I.P. of A Columbus Works, et al v. Crown Appraisal, Et Al
as 1:2009cv11401
Plaintiff:
John Doherty, John Doherty, James R. Burgey, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Crown Appraisal Group, Inc,, Andrew J. Moye and Steve Bolton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
T-Mobile Northeast LLC v. The Town of Weston et al
as 1:2009cv11366
Plaintiff:
T-Mobile Northeast LLC and T-Mobile Northeast LLC
Defendant:
The Town of Weston, The Town of Weston Zoning Board of Appeals, Wendy Kaplan Armour and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332 (c) Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996
In the matter of the Application of Zeno Corporation et al
as 1:2009mc10120
Petitioner:
In the matter of the Application of Zeno Corporation and In the matter of the Application of Zeno Corporation
Respondent:
Dr. Huan-Chen Li, Xioguang Wang, Hontech Foundation For Medical Technology and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv11536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv11358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv40130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.