Cases 41 - 50 of 552
Newkirk v. Artrip et al
as 7:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Newkirk
Defendant:
Warden Artrip, Investigator Harris, Assistant Warden Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Custis v. Exmore Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
William Parke Custis
Defendant:
Exmore Police Department, Adam Zieger, Jonathan Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Puller v. Dotson et al
as 3:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Toccara Yvonne Puller and Toccara Y. Puller
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, Adam Krischer and Judge Fiorre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunmore v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Bruce Dunmore
Defendant:
Clerk Brenda S. Hamilton, Deputy Clerk of Roanoke Circuit Court, Deputy Dillon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Mohawk Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Mark Adams
Defendant:
Mohawk Industries, Inc. and DAL-TILE, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Keen v. Wexford Medical et al
as 7:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Joshua Adam Keen
Defendant:
Wexford Medical, Dr. Crystal Large and HSA Kayla Helton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Duffield Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Samuel Smith
Defendant:
Duffield Jail, Chaplain R. Adams, Lt. R. Templeton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0041 Federal Trade Commission Act
Adams v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Tyler Chase Adams
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rakibu v. U.S. Immigration And Customs Enforcement
as 3:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
Adam Rakibu
Respondent:
U.S. Immigration And Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
