Cases 41 - 50 of 94
Garcia v. Armor Correctional Health Services Inc et al
as 2:2017cv01075
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Garcia
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Services Inc, Cary Adriano, Latisha Aikens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alfredo Garcia Montano v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-72151
Petitioner:
ALFREDO GARCIA MONTANO, AKA Alfredo Garcia
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Garcia #199037 v. Corizon Health Services et al
as 2:2016cv04569
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Garcia
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, Donna Mendoza and Kataushia Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00845
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Garcia-Garcia v. United States
as 5:2016cv00042
Petitioner:
Alfredo Garcia-Garcia
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fun Slide, LLC v. Nanjing East Inflatables Manufacturing Co., Ltd. et al
as 6:2015cv01124
Plaintiff:
Fun Slide, LLC
Defendant:
Nanjing East Inflatables Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and Alfredo Garcia d/b/a Jumping Castles
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Garcia
as 1:2015cv01732
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Alfredo Garcia
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
ALE Solutions, Inc. v. Starpoint Digital, Inc. d/b/a Express Hotel Housing et al
as 1:2015cv09119
Plaintiff:
ALE Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Starpoint Digital, Inc., Theresa Palazzo, Daniel C. Marlow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
