Cases 41 - 50 of 68
Smith v. Boyle et al
as 5:2016ct03274
Plaintiff:
David L. Smith
Defendant:
Terrence W. Boyle and Pat Hansen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Britt et al
as 5:2016ct03211
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
W. Earl Britt, James C. Fox, James C. Dever, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ford v. Boyle
as 5:2015cv00507
Plaintiff:
Beth Ford
Defendant:
Greg Boyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Phillips v. Boyle
as 5:2015ct03327
Plaintiff:
Oliver Kareem Phillips
Defendant:
Terrence W. Boyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilder v. Lynch, et al
as 7:2015cv00235
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr.
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Wilmington NC Police, Federal Probation Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nobles v. United States of America et al
as 5:2015ct03217
Plaintiff:
Cornelius A. Nobles
Defendant:
United States of America and Terrence W. Boyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilder v. Wilmington NC Police, et al
as 7:2015cv00236
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr.
Defendant:
Wilmington, NC Police, New Hanover County, NC Sheriff's Office, Federal Probation Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Midyette v. United States of America, et al
as 5:2015hc02108
Petitioner:
Joseph D. Midyette
Respondent:
United States of America, Terrence W. Boyle and Attorney General of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
VAN DYKE PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW PROPHET PASTOR RABBI v. SLUSSER et al
as 1:2014cv00712
Plaintiff:
SAINT DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW PROPHET PASTOR RABBI
Defendant:
SCOTT T. SLUSSER, SEAN PERRIN, ADRIAN W. DELLINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2014cv00578
Plaintiff:
PROPHET PREACHER PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE
Defendant:
ROGER JAMES DAVIS, BRUSE BURGER, CHARLES VANCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
