Cases 41 - 50 of 68
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Baltimore Life Insurance Company v. McCormick et al
as 5:2013cv02560
Plaintiff:
Baltimore Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Tommie McCormick, Jr. , Aulonda McCormick, Gaynell McCormick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Calhoun v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 2:2013cv01011
Plaintiff:
Jack B Calhoun, Jr
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Calhoun et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp21216
Plaintiff:
Shelia Calhoun and James Calhoun
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Calhoun v. USA
as 1:2013cv00325
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Christopher L Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Calhoun v. Middletown et al
as 1:2012cv00813
Plaintiff:
Daryl Calhoun
Defendant:
Middletown Police Department, Chief of Police, Middletown, Ohio, Officer Kenneth Mynhier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Calhoun v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp22683
Plaintiff:
Terri Lynn Calhoun
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Calhoun v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2012cv00185
Plaintiff:
Joshua Calhoun
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
