Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Robinson v. Jefferson County Jail Official et al
as 2:2013cv00700
Plaintiff:
Carl Ray Robinson
Defendant:
Jefferson County Jail Official, Medical Service Porvider and State of Alabama Department of Corrections
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carl Jackson v. Kathleen Allison
as 13-55412
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARL RAY JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
KATHLEEN ALLISON, Warden
Carl Lockwood v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 13-15342
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARL RAY LOCKWOOD
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00027
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Ray v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al.
as 1:2012dp22666
Plaintiff:
Carl Ray
Defendant:
DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Allison
as 3:2012cv01701
Petitioner:
Carl Ray Jackson
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lockwood v. Ryan et al
as 2:2012cv01440
Petitioner:
Carl Ray Lockwood
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Allison
as 3:2012cv01575
Petitioner:
Carl Ray Jackson
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robinson v. Russell et al
as 2:2012cv01760
Plaintiff:
Carl Ray Robinson
Defendant:
Russell, Zigler, Nations and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Russell et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00244
Plaintiff:
Carl Ray Robinson
Defendant:
Deputy Russell, Deputy Zigler, Deputy Nations and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
