Cases 41 - 50 of 104
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01231
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Mejia v. CC Restaurant Group, Corp. et al
as 2:2018cv01074
Defendant:
Gavin Doherty, Lindsay Doherty and CC Restaurant Group, Corp.
Plaintiff:
Elvin Mejia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv07080
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Traxxall Services Inc. v. Doherty et al
as 1:2017cv08281
Plaintiff:
Traxxall Services Inc.
Defendant:
Vincent Doherty and Camp Systems International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ray et al v. 1650 Broadway Associates Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv09858
Plaintiff:
Kevin Ray , Brian Esposito , Samuel Ladd and others
Defendant:
1650 Broadway Associates Inc., Ken Sturm and Ellen Sturm
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv09253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Baez et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv06340
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Baez, Joaquin Lugo and Cristina Montanez
Defendant:
Police Officer Ryan Doherty, P.O.'s John Doe #1-10, and The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doherty v. The City of Albany
as 1:2016cv01177
Plaintiff:
Lee Ann Doherty
Defendant:
The City of Albany
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
Montero et al v. HomeServe USA Corp.
as 1:2016cv04559
Plaintiff:
Ryan Deofaran, Mike Doherty, Aaron Gordon and others
Defendant:
HomeServe USA Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Doherty v. Rolst Construction Corp. et al
as 1:2016cv05399
Plaintiff:
Philip Doherty
Defendant:
Rolst Construction Corp. and John Doherty
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
