Cases 41 - 50 of 853
ESTATE OF KATHARINE SARANAM JOHNSTON v. FLOYD COUNTY INDIANA et al
as 1:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF KATHARINE SARANAM JOHNSTON
Defendant:
FLOYD COUNTY INDIANA, FLOYD COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, DAN FOREMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMAS v. VANIHEL
as 2:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
GENTLE THOMAS, JR.
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STANDEFORD v. VANIHEL
as 2:2024cv00072
Petitioner:
ZACHARY STANDEFORD
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GRIMES v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM R. GRIMES
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, COOPER, RANDY PERCELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grimes v. Vanihel et al
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
William R. Grimes
Defendant:
Frank Vanihel, Mrs. Cooper, Randy Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCRACKEN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MCCRACKEN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, CARLA COAKLEY, M. PAYNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VANDERPOOL v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
DANIEL C. VANDERPOOL, JR.
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, MARK PAYNE, JAY HENDRIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hester-Spann v. Franke et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Shane M Hester-Spann
Defendant:
Carren Franke, Jeremy K. Nix, Jennifer Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. VANIHEL
as 1:2024cv00140
Petitioner:
KENDALL JOHNSON
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hester-Spann v. Newton et al
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Shane M Hester-Spann
Defendant:
Chris Newton, Jennifer Newton, Carren Franke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
