Cases 41 - 50 of 104
FRIEND v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv04560
Plaintiff:
RHAHEEM FRIEND
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE , CARLOS VEGA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAKE et al v. CITY OF SHARON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2017cv00957
Plaintiff:
SHAWN R. HAKE and CYNTHIA L. LOYA
Defendant:
CITY OF SHARON POLICE DEPARTMENT , JOHN DOE NUMBER 1 , JOHN DOE NUMBER 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
WALKER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv01398
Plaintiff:
TREVOR WALKER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , ANDERSON , LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milhouse v. Doe 1-3
as 1:2016cv00146
Plaintiff:
Kareem Hassan Milhouse
Defendant:
John Doe 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Momo v. Sable et al
as 3:2015cv01665
Plaintiff:
Joseph Momo
Defendant:
Mary Sable, Izzirrary, John Doe No. 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUNT v. BURLINGTON CHEVROLET, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv04387
Plaintiff:
JAMES HUNT
Defendant:
BURLINGTON CHEVROLET, INC. , WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
TAYLOR v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2015cv02208
Plaintiff:
COREY TAYLOR
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JOHN DOE OFFICER 1, JOHN DOE OFFICER 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gaeta v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania State Police et al
as 1:2015cv00797
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gaeta
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania State Police, Frank Noonan, Michael Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. SINGLETON et al
as 2:2015cv01014
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JONES
Defendant:
RAYMOND SINGLETON, MICHAEL EDINGER, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv06230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
