Cases 41 - 50 of 137
THOMAS v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
WALTER S THOMAS
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MAYO CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION ANNEX and SECURUS JPAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeFour v. JPay, Inc. et al
as 7:2022cv00378
Plaintiff:
Jeremy DeFour
Defendant:
JPay, Inc., Bryant, Woodson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell v. Annucci et al
as 9:2022cv00701
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Scott Kelly, Earl Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeFour v. Doe et al
as 7:2022cv00295
Plaintiff:
Jeremy DeFour
Defendant:
John Doe, Meinhard, Woodson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. JPay, et al
as 22-3098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAIDON BLAKE
Defendant / Appellee:
JPAY, PAUL SNYDER and JOE NORWOOD
CLARK v. DIXON
as 4:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
RONALD WAYNE CLARK, JR
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON and JPAY LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adam Goldman v. Sheriff of Polk County, Florida, et al
as 22-11308
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADAM GOLDMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERIFF OF POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA, HOWARD L. DIMMIG, II, Public Defender, PUBLIC DEFENDER and others
Goldman v. Dimmig et al
as 8:2022cv00858
Plaintiff:
Adam Goldman
Defendant:
Howard L. Dimmig, II, Grace Bowles, Brian W. Haas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grogan et al v. Diaz et al
as 3:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Tyler Grogan and Tommy Mims
Defendant:
Luz Diaz, Devin Nuckles, Veronica Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldman et al v. Judd et al
as 8:2022cv00549
Plaintiff:
Adam Goldman, Joshua M. Shaw, Charles Johnson and others
Defendant:
Grady Judd, Howard L. Dimmig, II, Ita M. Neymotin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
