Cases 41 - 50 of 151
FONTAINE v. ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv01902
Plaintiff:
PIERRE FONTAINE
Defendant:
ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS, INC., JAMES TAYLOR, JASON LUO and others
LI v. LIQUID WEB INC.
as 1:2022cv00672
Plaintiff:
ZHI MING LI
Defendant:
LIQUID WEB INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HACKER v. ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00545
Defendant:
ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS INC., FORUM MERGER III CORP., JAMES TAYLOR and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT T. HACKER
YEOMAN et al v. XU et al
as 2:2022cv00410
Defendant:
HELEN ZHANG, XIAOYANG XU, NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY and others
Plaintiff:
ROY R. YEOMAN, III and NANODERM SCIENCES, INC.
LI et al v. GBM FOUNDATION COMPANY LTD
as 2:2021cv20617
Plaintiff:
JIA LI and DAVID HSIAO
Defendant:
GBM FOUNDATION COMPANY LTD doing business as BITMART and GBM FOUNDATION COMPANY LTD a Grand Cayman Islands Corporation doing business as BITMART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv08715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
SMK FRANCHISING, INC. et al v. NEW HONG FANG CUISINE INC. et al
as 1:2021cv14584
Plaintiff:
SMK FRANCHISING, INC. and KCP FOOD (U.S.), INC.
Defendant:
NEW HONG FANG CUISINE INC. and YUN LI
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
YANG v. JC MASTER NIU INC et al
as 2:2021cv15394
Defendant:
XIN LI NIU, WANG ZIXIN, JC MASTER NIU INC doing business as Taste of North China and others
Plaintiff:
BAO YU YANG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv14303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv11642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
