Cases 41 - 50 of 166
Cortes v. Legal Recovery Law Offices, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00672
Plaintiff:
John Cortes
Defendant:
Legal Recovery Law Offices, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pace v. Midland Funding LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00521
Plaintiff:
William Pace
Defendant:
Midland Funding LLC, Legal Recovery Law Offices, Inc. and Mark Walsh
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Quintini v. Legal Recovery Law Offices, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00522
Plaintiff:
Anna Quintini
Defendant:
Legal Recovery Law Offices, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Escalante v. Legal Recovery Law Offices et al
as 3:2013cv00124
Plaintiff:
Lisa Escalante
Defendant:
Legal Recovery Law Offices, Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc., Mark Walsh and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv00037
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Chung v. Midland Funding, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv02975
Plaintiff:
Geraldine Chung
Defendant:
Midland Funding, LLC and Legal Recovery Law Offices, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Leung v. Capital One Bank (USA) N.A. et al
as 3:2012cv02760
Plaintiff:
Sauwan Leung
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA) N.A., Legal Recovery Law Offices, Inc. and Mark Walsh
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
