Cases 41 - 50 of 269
Young v. Clark
as 3:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Michael Young
Defendant:
Dwayne Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boado v. Michael Young Realty, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00331
Plaintiff:
Renato Boado
Defendant:
Michael Young Realty, Inc. and DHK Property Two LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
White v. Renzi et al
as 1:2021cv00504
Plaintiff:
Dyanna M. White
Defendant:
Judge Eugene Renzi, Judge Peter Shwerzmann, Attorney Michael Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Howard v. City of Wood River et al
as 3:2021cv01598
Plaintiff:
Sheena Howard
Defendant:
City of Wood River, Michael Young, John Hoefert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv63290
Plaintiff:
MORGAN MICHAEL YOUNG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young v. Kadmon Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05641
Plaintiff:
Michael Young
Defendant:
Kadmon Holdings, Inc., Tasos G. Konidaris, Harlan W. Waksal and others
Hueter et al v. AST Telecomm LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00377
Plaintiff:
Steven Jay Pincus Hueter, Faamuli Pete Faamuli and Michael S. Kirk
Defendant:
AST Telecomm LLC d/b/a Bluesky Communications, Raj Deo, Paul Michael Young and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
YOUNG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv46150
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MICHAEL YOUNG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Internet Transaction Services Inc et al
as 2:2021ms00064
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Internet Transaction Services Inc, Intertrans.com, Inc, Edward Courdy and others
Receiver:
Thomas W. McNamara
Dan Michael Young v. Raymond Madden
as 2:2021cv06069
Petitioner:
Dan Michael Young
Respondent:
Warden Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
