Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HUBBARD v. BOHMAN, et al
as 1:2011cv00716
Plaintiff:
DARRELL LAMONT HUBBARD
Defendant:
TRAVIS D. BOHMAN , J. L. STARLING , ROGER ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
HUBBARD v. STARLING et al
as 1:2011cv00681
Plaintiff:
DARRELL LAMONT HUBBARD
Defendant:
J. L. STARLING, ROGER ALLEN, TIM THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Richmond v. Astrue
as 7:2011cv00147
Plaintiff:
Rhonda L. Richmond
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PARROT v. REINHARDT et al
as 1:2010cv00899
Plaintiff:
GLENN PARROTT , JANE PARROTT and JAMES PARROTT
Defendant:
WALTER RAY REINHARDT, JULIUS EVERETT "B JOHNSON, BENEFIT CONTRACT ADMINISTRATORS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
PHILLIPS
as 1:2010cv00862
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH L. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
RICHMOND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES and NC DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00877
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Raleigh Capital Management, Inc. et al
as 5:2009mc00051
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant:
Raleigh Capital Management, Inc. and Richmond H. Hamilton, Jr.
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION v. RALEIGH CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC. et al
as 1:2009mc00056
Plaintiff:
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Defendant:
RALEIGH CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC., RICHMOND H. HAMILTON, JR. and RALEIGH FUND, LP
Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. Richmond Hill, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00377
Plaintiff:
Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Richmond Hill, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
