Cases 41 - 50 of 129
Doe v. Boy Scouts of America et al
as 1:2020cv00211
Defendant:
Boy Scouts of America, Twin Rivers Council, Inc., Boy Scouts of America and Glens Falls City School District
Plaintiff:
John Doe
N.S. v. Boy Scouts of America et al
as 1:2020cv00175
Defendant:
Boy Scouts of America and Twin Rivers Council, Boy Scouts of America
Plaintiff:
N. S.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 R&R re motions to remand (non-core)
A.P. et al v. Boy Scouts of America et al
as 1:2020cv00167
Plaintiff:
J.C., C.B. and A.P.
Defendant:
Boy Scouts of America and Twin Rivers Council
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
D.M. v. Boy Scouts of America et al
as 1:2020cv00208
Plaintiff:
D.M.
Defendant:
Boy Scouts of America and Twin Rivers Council, Boy Scouts of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
D.M. v. Boy Scouts of America et al
as 1:2020cv00170
Plaintiff:
D.M.
Defendant:
Boy Scouts of America and Twin Rivers Council of the Boy Scouts of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 R&R re motions to remand (non-core)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Sankey v. UTGR, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00634
Defendant:
Twin River Management Group, Inc. and UTGR, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Sankey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00698
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Warren v. State of Washington Attorney General et al
as 2:2019cv01413
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, State of Washington Attorney General, Kenneth Sawyer and others
Plaintiff:
Richard H Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00555
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
