Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Grender, William v. Doe, Jane et al
as 3:2019cv00403
Defendant:
Psychologist Heather L. Schwenn, Sergeant Jane Doe, Correctional Officer Sanchez and others
Plaintiff:
William R. Grender
Undetermined:
WSPF Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald, James v. Speckhart, Eric et al
as 3:2019cv00134
Plaintiff:
James Malcolm McDonald
Defendant:
Unit Manager Kragness and Unit Manager Eric Speckhart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neas v. Unit Manager et al
as 2:2018cv01140
Defendant:
Unit Manager and Winnebago Mental Health Institute
Plaintiff:
Robert William Neas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acosta v. Doe et al
as 2:2018cv00439
Plaintiff:
Reinaldo Acosta, Jr
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, Unit Manager Schroder and Sgt Mackey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neas v. Winnebago Mental Health Hospital
as 2:2018cv00103
Plaintiff:
Robert William Neas
Defendant:
Winnebago Mental Health Hospital and Unit Manager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tackett v. Litscher et al
as 2:2017cv00202
Plaintiff:
Timothy Greg Tackett
Defendant:
Jon Litscher , Paul Kemper, Brad Hompe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pittman, Corey v. Napralla, Gary et al
as 3:2015cv00021
Plaintiff:
Corey R. Pittman
Defendant:
Gary Napralla , Dustin Kingsland, Palmer Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. FMC Rochester Medical et al
as 2:2013cv01374
Petitioner:
John J Miller
Respondent:
FMC Rochester Medical, J B Brett, Unit Manager Haugen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Scott v. Wisconsin Secure Program Facility et al
as 2:2013cv01010
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott
Defendant:
Wisconsin Secure Program Facility , Warden Herman, Warden Haines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
