Civil Rights Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 41 - 50 of 17,394
Smith v. Ivey et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00221
Plaintiff: Peter J. Smith
Defendant: Kay Ivey, Nancy Buckner, Brandon Hardin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00448
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hamby v. Phoenix Millworks Distributors Inc
as 5:2024cv00207
Plaintiff: James Hamby
Defendant: Phoenix Millworks Distributors Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00193
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Harris v. Standard Guaranty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv00153
Plaintiff: Roderick Harris
Defendant: Standard Guaranty Insurance Company, Crawford & Company and Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
M. et al v. Azar et al
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff: Michaela M., Gabriel M., Kinley G. and others
Defendant: Stephanie M. Azar and Jean W. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Binion v. City of Clanton et al
as 2:2024cv00213
Plaintiff: Robert R. Binion
Defendant: City of Clanton, City Council Clanton and Jeff Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00217
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00204
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00068
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?