Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in Wyoming
Cases 41 - 50 of 64
USA v. Mount Rushmore Broadcasting Inc
as 2:2004cv00032
Cause Of Action: Complaint for Forfeiture
USA v. $204960 US Currency
as 2:2004cv00359
United States of America v. EDM Arms, Windrunner XM04 Rifle, Twelve Other Firearms and Assorted Ammunition
as 2:2008cv00067
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: EDM Arms, Windrunner XM04 Rifle, Twelve Other Firearms and Assorted Ammunition
Cause Of Action: Civil forfeiture
United States of America v. 435 Pierce Avenue
as 2:2010cv00026
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 4355 Pierce Avenue, Cheyenne, Laramie County, Wyoming
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Hohlios v USA
as 1:2011cv00016
Defendant: United States of America
Plaintiff: Frank Hohlios
Cause Of Action: Civil Forfeiture Proceedings
United States of America v. $3322230 US Currency
as 2:2007cv00191
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $3322230 US Currency
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Numerous Rounds of Assorted Ammunition
as 2:2012cv00129
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Numerous Rounds of Assorted Ammunition
Cause Of Action: Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Rossi, Model M4122B, .22LR caliber rifle, serial number SP498812 et al
as 2:2009cv00161
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Rossi, Model M4122B, .22LR caliber rifle, serial number SP498812, Mossberg, Model 500A, Gamester, 12-gauge shotgun, serial number J749795, Remington, Model 581, .22 S-L-LR caliber rifle, serial number A1055836 and others
Cause Of Action: Civil forfeiture
Nava v. Wyoming Division of Criminal Investigation Director et al
as 2:2010cv00239
Plaintiff: Edgar Nava
Defendant: Wyoming Division of Criminal Investigation Director, Wyoming Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?