Cases 41 - 50 of 4,047
Woods v. McKeithen et al
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Woods
Defendant:
Jack McKeithen, Kevin Wyles, David Callender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. McKeithen et al
as 3:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Woods
Defendant:
Jack McKeithen, Kevin Wyles, David Callender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brewer v. Rosso
as 3:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Keith Brewer
Defendant:
Saundra Rosso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trim v. Bickham et al
as 3:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Joseph Trim
Defendant:
Earist D. Bickham, Nurse at DCI, Doctors at DCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Triplet v. East Baton Rouge Parish Prison et al
as 3:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Triplet
Defendant:
East Baton Rouge Parish Prison, Riverbend Detention Center, East Carol Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Michael Nelson
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc and Unknown Employee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Madison Correctional Security Management et al
as 3:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Shane Anthony Jones
Defendant:
Madison Correctional Security Management and Tangipahoa Parish Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCall v. LSP Investigation Service et al
as 3:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Eric McCall
Defendant:
LSP Investigation Service, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nedd v. Bickham
as 3:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Bryant Nedd
Defendant:
Dustin Bickham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holden v. Beckham
as 3:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Tony Delon Holden
Defendant:
Dustin Beckham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
