Cases 41 - 50 of 58,854
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Perkins v. Dallam et al
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Gavin Perkins
Defendant:
Ramsey Dallam, Steve Conrad, Detective Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crestbrook Insurance Company v. Hatfield et al
as 5:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Crestbrook Insurance Company
Defendant:
Rodney Hatfield, Capital Holdings 181, LLC and Sydney Riede
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Holliman v. Stanton et al
as 2:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
David Holliman
Defendant:
Steve Stanton, Stanton Homes, LLC. and Zachary Stayton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez v. Warden FCI Ashland
as 0:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
Jonathan Martinez
Respondent:
Warden FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
In Re Attorney Admission for John C. Ridge
as 5:2024aa00044
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney Admission Application
Greenleaf v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Greenleaf
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Taylor v. Empire Hotels, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Sammie Lee Taylor
Defendant:
Empire Hotels, Inc. doing business as Clarion Pointe Hopkinsville and Choice Hotels International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Thomas v. USA
as 5:2024cv00061
Petitioner:
Reginald R. Thomas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mitchell v. Knight
as 5:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Cindy Mitchell
Defendant:
David Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
