Antitrust Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 2,434
BLAIR-SMITH v. CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC., et al
as 1:2023cv06506
Plaintiff: MONICA BLAIR-SMITH
Defendant: CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.,, BOARDWALK REGENCY LLC d/b/a CAESARS ATLANTIC CITY HOTEL & CASINO, HARD ROCK INTERNATIONAL INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. EQT CORPORATION et al
as 2:2023cv01483
Plaintiff: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant: EQT CORPORATION, QEP PARTNERS, LP, QUANTUM ENERGY PARTNERS FUND VI, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
HAN v. INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv04147
Plaintiff: YOSH HAN
Defendant: INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES, INC., GIVAUDAN SA, GIVAUDAN FRAGRANCES CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
CRIMSON CANDLE SUPPLIES LLC v. DSM-FIRMENICH AG et al
as 2:2023cv03875
Plaintiff: CRIMSON CANDLE SUPPLIES LLC
Defendant: DSM-FIRMENICH AG, FIRMENICH INTERNATIONAL SA, FIRMENICH INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
In re: In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 23-2217
Not Classified By Court: In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and TEAMSTERS WESTERN REGION & LOCAL 177 HEALTH CARE PLAN
Appellant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Appellee: UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES BENEFIT FUND
In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 23-2214
Not Classified By Court: In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and others
Appellant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Appellee: TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES BENEFIT FUND
In re: In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 23-2215
Not Classified By Court: In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and TEAMSTERS WESTERN REGION & LOCAL 177 HEALTH CARE PLAN
Appellant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Appellee: UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES BENEFIT FUND
In re: In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 23-2213
Not Classified By Court: In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and TEAMSTERS WESTERN REGION & LOCAL 177 HEALTH CARE PLAN
Appellant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Appellee: UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES BENEFIT FUND
In re: In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 23-2216
Not Classified By Court: In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and TEAMSTERS WESTERN REGION & LOCAL 177 HEALTH CARE PLAN
Appellant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Appellee: UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES BENEFIT FUND
ALEXIA DAHMES v. FIRMENICH SA et al
as 2:2023cv03547
Plaintiff: ALEXIA DAHMES individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated doing business as ALEXIA VIOLA NAPA VALLEY
Defendant: FIRMENICH SA, FIRMENICH INCORPORATED, AGILEX FLAVORS & FRAGRANCE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?