Cases 51 - 60 of 67
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv04275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chatman v. Sidhu et al
as 2:2008cv00435
Plaintiff:
Laval Chatman
Defendant:
Rupinderdeep Singh Sidhu and Eldorado Logistics Systems
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Stokes v. Chatman et al
as 4:2008cv00425
Plaintiff:
Jessica Stokes
Defendant:
Odis Chatman and House of Sports, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Lindsey et al v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit et al
as 3:2008cv01096
Plaintiff:
James Lindsey, Gloria Abdelaziz, Kimberly Addison and others
Defendant:
Dallas Area Rapid Transit and United States Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Chatman v. The City of Dallas et al
as 3:2008cv00767
Plaintiff:
Charles Allen Chatman and Charles Allen Chatman
Defendant:
The City of Dallas and Donald Ortega
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chatman v. Rickmers Genoa Schiffarts et al
as 4:2008cv01362
Plaintiff:
Van Dupree Chatman
Defendant:
Rickmers Genoa Schiffarts, Rickmers Reederei GmbH & Cie. KG and Rickmers Linie GmbH and Cie. KG
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Lindsey et al v. ATU International et al
as 3:2008cv00232
Plaintiff:
James Lindsey, Gloria Abdelaziz, Kimberly Addison and others
Defendant:
ATU International, ATU International, Amalgamated Transit Union Local Division 1635 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
