Cases 51 - 60 of 2,747
Wood v. Clarke et al
as 2:2023cv00644
Plaintiff:
James R. Wood
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Mark Amonette, MD, Mr. Dillon, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Starks, Jr. v. Clarke et al
as 2:2023cv00633
Plaintiff:
Bernard Lee Starks, Jr.
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Kevin McCoy, A. Wethington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipford v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00778
Petitioner:
Keon Deshea Lipford
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke and Chadwick S. Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dawson v. Bozman et al
as 2:2023cv00632
Plaintiff:
Michael Dawson
Defendant:
Sergeant Bozman, Lieutenant Allen, Major Lassiter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patterson v. Clarke
as 2:2023cv00606
Petitioner:
Richard A. Patterson
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke and Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wood v. Clarke et al.
as 1:2023cv01809
Plaintiff:
James R. Wood
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Steve Herrick, J.D. Oates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoover v. Clarke
as 1:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
Malik Raheem Hoover
Defendant:
H. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Leslie J. Fleming, Beth E. Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavez v. United States et al
as 2:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Koby Chavez
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick B. Garland, Rob Bonta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Bartee v. Clarke et al
as 2:2023cv00593
Plaintiff:
Steven Bartee
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke and Gloria F. Sivels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
