Cases 51 - 60 of 1,993
King v. Ally et al
as 2:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
Mr. Dontonio King
Defendant:
Sgt. Ally, Ofc. J. Verity, Ofc. Bourdain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chaney v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00684
Plaintiff:
Dillon J. Chaney
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Acken v. Dollar Tree Stores Inc.
as 3:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Acken
Defendant:
Dollar Tree Stores Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lopez v. Reyes et al
as 2:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Constantino Lopez
Defendant:
Erin Reyes, T. Hudson, Patrick Maney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farris v. Reyes
as 2:2024cv00280
Petitioner:
Robin J. Farris
Respondent:
Erin Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
January v. Harris et al
as 3:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
Mervin W. January
Defendant:
Miss Breshawn N. Harris and Miss Sarita J. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
J.S.S. v. Northern Oregon Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
J. S. S.
Defendant:
Northern Oregon Corrections and Josue Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
J.G.T. v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
J. G.T.
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, FELICIA JONES and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marquart v. City of Shaniko et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Zachary Forrest Marquart
Defendant:
City of Shaniko, David R. Long, Diana L. Marrs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harper v. Taylor, et al
as 2:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Daniel Zachary Harper
Defendant:
Michael Taylor, Jr., J. Carey, J. Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
