Cases 51 - 60 of 87
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Harris v. U.S. Bank N.A. et al
as 1:2012cv02219
Defendant:
Mark D. Clarke, Cody J. Elliott, Ron Grensky and others
Plaintiff:
Earl C. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stribling v. Defazio et al
as 2:2012cv02729
Plaintiff:
Aaron L. Stribling
Defendant:
J. Defazio, R. Masterson, T. Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rickey Barnes v. B. Arvie, et al
as 12-31022
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKEY BARNES
Defendant - Appellee:
B. ARVIE, Sergeant, IRVING STAMMERICH, Captain, CLINT BOND, Captain and others
Pittsburg SNF LLC et al
as 1:2012mc00202
Plaintiff:
Pittsburg SNF LLC , Balch Springs SNF LLC , Bay Oaks SNF LLC and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Pharmerica East, Inc.
Thirdparty_defendant:
Pharmaster L. P , Pharmaster GP, LLC , Peter Licari and others
Miscellaneou:
Jacob Karmel
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Compel
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00064
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00628
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Zorn v. Middleton et al
as 4:2011cv02101
Plaintiff:
Carl Zorn
Defendant:
Fred A. Middleton, Christopher Alafi, David W. Benfer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rickey Barnes v. B. Arvie, et al
as 11-31026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKEY BARNES
Defendant - Appellee:
B. ARVIE, Sergeant, IRVING STAMMERICH, Captain, CLINT BOND, Captain and others
CORNEJO v. SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 1:2011cv02910
Plaintiff:
OSCAR ERNESTO CORNEJO
Defendant:
Superior Court and FRANK C MILLS, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
