Cases 51 - 60 of 118
Salmons v. The State of Oregon DHS et al
as 1:2017cv01104
Defendant:
Carter Joni Collection Agency LLC, State of Oregon Attorneys Generals Office, The City of Klamath Falls, Oregon and others
Plaintiff:
John Salmons, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. McNitt et al
as 2:2017cv00888
Defendant:
17 Co-Conspiritors and C/O McNitt
Plaintiff:
Chris Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Peters et al
as 2:2017cv00786
Defendant:
Doug Abbott, Lt. Steve Boston, C.O. Linda Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Michael James Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2017cv00580
Plaintiff:
Ronald Marxs Carter
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Lee v. Carter
as 3:2017cv00457
Defendant:
Lt Carter
Plaintiff:
Brandon Che Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olsen v. Carter-Jones Collection Service, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00211
Defendant:
Carter-Jones Collection Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tricia Olsen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ashley M. Carter
as 3:2016ad00319
In Re:
Ashley M. Carter
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Warren v. Shelton et al
as 3:2016cv02158
Defendant:
B. Carter, Christopher DiGiulio and Steven Shelton
Plaintiff:
Dennis Jay Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2016cv02146
Plaintiff:
Michelle Carter
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Carter v. USA
as 3:2016cv01196
Petitioner:
Daniel Arthur Carter
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
