Cases 51 - 60 of 73
Julie Horn v. Hot Topic Inc et al
as 2:2013cv02939
Defendant:
212F Holdings LLC, Steven R Becker, Evelyn D An and others
Plaintiff:
Julie Horn
Patrick Walton et al v. Hot Topic Inc et al
as 2:2013cv02941
Defendant:
212F Holdings LLC, Steven R Becker, Evelyn D An and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Walton and Patrick Walton
Sarah Megan Norton v. Hot Topic Inc et al
as 2:2012cv09195
Defendant:
Does, Hip Hop Wholesale Inc and Hot Topic Inc
Plaintiff:
Sarah Megan Norton
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Geotag, Inc. v. Hot Topic Inc.
as 2:2012cv00472
Plaintiff:
Geotag, Inc.
Defendant:
Hot Topic Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Hot Topic Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Geotag, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Onch Movement LLC v. Hot Topic Inc et al
as 2:2012cv05896
Defendant:
Does and Hot Topic Inc
Plaintiff:
Onch Movement LLC
Gary Friedrich Enterprises LLC v. Marvel Enterprises Inc.
as 12-893
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
Gary Friedrich Enterprises, LLC. and Gary Friedrich
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Marvel Characters, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Defendant:
3 Day Blinds, AAGlobal Industries, ABDO Publishing and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Marvel Enterprises, Incorporated, a Delaware corporation, Marvel Entertainment, Incorporated, a Delaware corporation, Marvel Studios, Inc., a Delaware corporation and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv05384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
