Cases 51 - 60 of 1,262
Brinson v. Macomb Correctional Facility
as 2:2023cv12658
Petitioner:
Michael Lee Brinson, II
Respondent:
Macomb Correctional Facility
Perez et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2023cv01269
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Perez and Adriana Briseno
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
LEE et al v. THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY et al
as 2:2023cv21126
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEE, TONI HEUCHAN, JONATHAN BRANDMAN and others
Defendant:
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY and HELEN OF TROY LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
POLK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13879
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEE POLK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
YOUNG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12665
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEE YOUNG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sigmon v. Brown et al
as 5:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Mary Sigmon
Defendant:
Don Brown, Michael Lee Speagle and Adam Taylor Stout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARNAHAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03888
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEE CARNAHAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bivens v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv11005
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Bivens
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
CALVIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv01501
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEE CALVIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Vantiger
as 23-2100
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL LEE VANTIGER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
