Cases 51 - 60 of 70
KENNEY v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2012cv00551
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY KENNEY
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, CHIEF OF POLICE NATHAN HARPER, OFFICER MATTHEW TURKO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2012cv00329
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SMITH
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY , CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , CARL R. GREENE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ball v. Hummel et al
as 1:2011cv01422
Plaintiff:
Dawn Ball
Defendant:
Lt. Hummel, Bucher, Dymmick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THIERET et al v. PEPSI BEVERAGES COMPANY
as 2:2011cv00644
Plaintiff:
DENNIS THIERET , RONALD L. BUCKNER , DAVID S. BENGEL and others
Defendant:
PEPSI BEVERAGES COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
SMITH et al v. H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv64615
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SMITH and MILDRED SMITH
Defendant:
H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC., RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC., RAYTECH CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv33518
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SMITH, JR
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SMITH et al V. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES ET AL.
as 2:2011cv60389
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ROBERT SMITH and FLORA VIRGINIA SMITH
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUDSTRIES, INC. , CORPORATION KEENE , OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv06060
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SMITH
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv53751
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SMITH
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
SMITH v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES INC
as 2:2010cv67483
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SMITH
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
