Cases 51 - 60 of 61
Ricardo Lezama Arellano v. Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security
as 5:2017cv02412
Petitioner:
Ricard Lezama Arellano
Defendant:
Attorney General of The U.S., Director of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, San Bernardino Field Office Director fo the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00529
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04694
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
K.H. v. Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security
as 3:2015cv02740
Plaintiff:
K.H.
Defendant:
Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv04600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01039
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02012
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Singh v. Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2011cv05577
Petitioner:
Satprit Singh
Respondent:
Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Director U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Singh v. U.S. Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2009cv04827
Petitioner:
Gurmeet Singh
Respondent:
U.S. Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Eric Holder, Jr. and USCIS Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.