Other Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 14,364
United States of America v. Approximately Five Hundred Forty-One Thousand Nine Hundred Fifty-Three Dollars and Zero Cents ($541,953.00) Seized from JP Morgan Chase Na Account Number 928805297 Held In The Name of Jiawig Trade Inc.
as 1:2023cv09585
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: APPROXIMATELY FIVE HUNDRED FORTY-ONE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED FIFTY-THREE DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS ($541,953.00) SEIZED FROM JP MORGAN CHASE NA ACCOUNT NUMBER 928805297 HELD IN THE NAME OF JIAWIG TRAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Approximately 32.68342694 Bitcoin (and funds derived therefrom) formerly held in wallet address 1G3pyCCFENTp8EHANrGBpmEKNobPqA5CLg, seized from a Binance.com exchange account associated with user id 3
as 2:2023cv02010
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately 32.68342694 Bitcoin (and funds derived therefrom) formerly held in wallet address 1G3pyCCFENTp8EHANrGBpmEKNobPqA5CLg, seized from a Binance.com exchange account associated with user id 3 and Approx 32.68342694 Bitcoin (and funds derived therefrom) formerly held in wallet address 1G3pyCCFENTp8EHANrGBpmEKNobPqA5CLg, seized from a Binance.com exchange acct associated with user id 395972026
Interested Party: Advocus National Title Insurance Company doing business as Attorneys' Title Guaranty Fund Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture - Gambling, etc.
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2024cv00529
Not Yet Classified: $601,426.19 OF FUNDS ASSOCIATED WITH DYNAPEX ENERGY LIMITED
Defendant: $4,866,527.84 OF FUNDS ASSOCIATED WITH DYNAPEX ENERGY LIMITED, $160,810.94 ASSOCIATED WITH BINRIN LIMITED, $1,078,587.67 ASSOCIATED WITH SIBSHUR LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Taurus 9mm, Ruger 9mm, Clips & Ammunition
as 4:2024cv00668
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: Taurus 9mm, Ruger 9mm, Clips & Ammunition
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Forfeiture in Rem
United States of America v. Real Property Located at 464 Winchester Drive Stansbury Park Utah
as 2:2024cv00139
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Real Property Located at 464 Winchester Drive Stansbury Park Utah
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
In Re Return of $32,000 In United States Currency
as 3:2024cv00018
Not Yet Classified: Return of $32,000 in United States Currency
Petitioner: Javier Ciscar-Bustamante
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0983 Civil Forfeiture - General Rules
USA v. Approx. $1,697,930.94 seized from River City Bank Account et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024mc00090
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $1,697,930.94 seized from River City Bank Account and Approximately $230,000.00 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account
Claimant: Daniel Stewart and Luke Burroughs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $22,190.07 IN FUNDS FROM JP MORGAN CHASE BANK ACCOUNT NO. XXXXXX595 HELD IN THE NAMES OF ANTHONY T. PALMER AND ANTHONY M.PALMER
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $22,190.07 IN FUNDS FROM JP MORGAN CHASE BANK ACCOUNT NO. XXXXXX595 HELD IN THE NAMES OF ANTHONY T. PALMER AND ANTHONY M.PALMER
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v $71,781.07 IN FUNDS FROM FIDELITY INVESTMENTS ACCOUNT XXX-XXX807 HELD IN THE NAME OF ANTHONY M. PALMER
as 1:2024cv00058
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $71,781.07 IN FUNDS FROM FIDELITY INVESTMENTS ACCOUNT XXX-XXX807 HELD IN THE NAME OF ANTHONY M. PALMER
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $47,014.85 IN FUNDS FROM INVESTMENT ACCOUNT XXX-XX0519 HELD IN THE NAME OF ANTHONY T. PALMER AT TD AMERITRADE IN LONE TREE, COLORADO
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $47,014.85 IN FUNDS FROM INVESTMENT ACCOUNT XXX-XX0519 HELD IN THE NAME OF ANTHONY T. PALMER AT TD AMERITRADE IN LONE TREE, COLORADO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?