Cases 51 - 60 of 10,508
NEWREZ LLC v. VANROSENDAEL et al
as 2:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
NEWREZ LLC doing business as SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING
Defendant:
NICOLE M VANROSENDAEL and MATTHEW J BENSON
Interested Party:
SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
HARPER et al v. TAVENNER
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
LINDA HARPER and ANTHONY HARPER
Defendant:
THOMAS TAVENNER, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ENWONWU v. AAA AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS OBIORA EMWONWU and FRANCIS OBIORA ENWONWU
Defendant:
AAA AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
DELEO v. JONES et al
as 2:2021cv00226
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
SHAW et al v. FADDEN
as 2:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SHAW and LISA SHAW
Defendant:
MATTHEW FADDEN doing business as CUSTOM CARE CONSTRUCTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ACADIA INSURANCE COMPANY v. DRISTEEM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
ACADIA INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
DRISTEEM CORPORATION and EMERSON-SWAN INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
GARDNER v. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
ELLEN GARDNER
Defendant:
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
ROSS v. WOODCOCK et al
as 1:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS
Defendant:
JUDGE WOODCOCK, MCCORMACK, BRYCE TURGENSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
