Cases 61 - 70 of 33,789
Intercurrency Software LLC v. Monex Group, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Intercurrency Software LLC
Defendant:
Monex Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Valtrus Innovations Ltd. v. CyrusOne, LLC
as 2:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Valtrus Innovations Ltd.
Defendant:
CyrusOne, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
HYPER ICE, INC. et al v. The TJX Companies, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
HYPER ICE, INC. and HYPERICE IP SUBCO, LLC
Defendant:
The TJX Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Intercurrency Software LLC v. Paybis Ltd.
as 2:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Intercurrency Software LLC
Defendant:
Paybis Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Intercurrency Software LLC v. BG Limited et al
as 2:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Intercurrency Software LLC
Defendant:
BG Limited and Singapore Bitget Pte Ltd
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
WFR IP, LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
WFR IP, LLC
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Sterling Computers Corporation v. Microsoft Corporation
as 1:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Sterling Computers Corporation
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Croga Innovations Ltd. v. Amazon Web Services, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Croga Innovations Ltd.
Defendant:
Amazon Web Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 100 Patent Infringement
Onscreen Dynamics, LLC v. Carvana, LLC
as 2:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Onscreen Dynamics, LLC
Defendant:
Carvana, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Quantum Technology Innovations, LLC v. Sirius XM Holdings Inc.
as 2:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Quantum Technology Innovations, LLC
Defendant:
Sirius XM Holdings Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
