Cases 61 - 70 of 85
Smith v. United Parcel Service
as 2:2014cv00102
Plaintiff:
Matthew Alan Smith
Defendant:
United Parcel Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mabe v. Vermont Department of Corrections, Commissioner of the et al
as 1:2014cv00012
Petitioner:
Matthew J. Mabe
Respondent:
Vermont Department of Corrections, Commissioner of the and State of Vermont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Matthews v. Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center et al
as 5:2013cv00309
Plaintiff:
Clifton A. Matthews
Defendant:
Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, John D. Seigne and Jorge L. Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schlein et al v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 5:2013cv00288
Plaintiff:
Matthew Schlein and Jacqueline Schlein
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schlein et al v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 2:2013cv00288
Plaintiff:
Matthew Schlein and Jacqueline Schlein
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chaney v. Stewart
as 2:2013cv00246
Plaintiff:
Matthew Chaney
Defendant:
Steven Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2013cv00195
Plaintiff:
Ellsworth W. Matthews
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Costello et al v. Home Depot, Inc.
as 5:2012cv00107
Plaintiff:
James D. Costello , Liza Logan , Matthew Picco and others
Defendant:
Home Depot USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gabriel v. Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences - Vermont Campus (ACPHS) et al
as 2:2012cv00014
Plaintiff:
Matthew Gabriel
Defendant:
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences - Vermont Campus (ACPHS) , Dorothy Pumo , Ronald A. DeBellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Voog v. Pallito et al
as 1:2011cv00094
Petitioner:
Matthew E. Voog
Respondent:
Andrew Pallito, John P. Wesley, David Sontag and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
