Cases 61 - 70 of 127
Malik Al-Jumail v. USA
as 2:2017cv11849
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Abdul Malik Al-Jumail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Abdul Issifu v. Attorney General United State
as 17-2208
Petitioner:
ABDUL MALIK ISSIFU
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Malik v. Klimek, Jr.
as 4:2017cv01610
Plaintiff:
Abdul Malik
Defendant:
Robert Craig Klimek, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
US v. Francis Curtis Davi
as 17-6609
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANCIS CURTIS DAVIS, a/k/a Abdul-Malik Lbnfrancis As-Salafi
Martinez v. Cummings et al
as 1:2017cv10539
Plaintiff:
Abdul Malik Martinez
Defendant:
James M. Cummings, John Rogerzenski, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ali v. City of Cleveland et al
as 1:2017cv00634
Plaintiff:
Abdul-Malik Ali
Defendant:
City of Cleveland , Ricky D. Smith, Sr. , Fred Szabo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Abdul Kareem
as 17-10118
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
ABDUL MALIK ABDUL KAREEM, AKA Decarus Thomas
USA v. Abdul Abdul Kareem
as 17-10067
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ABDUL MALIK ABDUL KAREEM, AKA Decarus Thomas
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00832
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
State of Hawaii v. Trump
as 1:2017cv00050
Defendant:
Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Donald J. Trump and others
Plaintiff:
State of Hawaii, Ismail Elshikh, Muslim Association of Hawaii, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Rabbi Joel Mosbacher, State of Oregon, American Center for Law and Justice and others
Intervenor:
Frederick Banks, Ph.D. Vincent Lucas, Joseph Camp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
