Cases 61 - 70 of 289
Roman v. Corley et al
as 1:2020cv01253
Defendant:
. Drysdale, Adrian Corley, . Sorenson and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Roman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801
Urrutia v. Johnson et al
as 1:2020cv03261
Defendant:
Jane Doe Prosecuting Attorney, Eddie Johnson and Adriane Valentin
Plaintiff:
Mark Urrutia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ochoa v. Lopez et al
as 1:2020cv02977
Defendant:
Eugene Schleder, City Of Chicago, Adrian Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Alberto Ochoa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Herrera et al v. Aztecas Mufflers and Brake Shop, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02816
Defendant:
Aztecas Mufflers and Brake Shop VI Inc., Aztecas Mufflers and Brake Shop IV Inc., Aztecas Mufflers and Brake Shop V Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Irving Adrian Herrera, Mario Herrera and Alexander Garcia
Roman v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2020cv01173
Defendant:
Adrian Corley, Downie Drysdale, A Wild and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Roman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Money et al v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2020cv02093
Plaintiff:
Carl Reed, Tewkunzi Green, Danny Labosette and others
Defendant:
Director of IDOC Rob Jeffreys, Governor J.B. Pritzker, Rob Jeffreys and others
Intervenor:
Jennifer Bishop-Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01842
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jackson v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01515
Plaintiff:
Adrian Jackson
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A, Inc. and Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez v. Hammers et al
as 1:2020cv01032
Defendant:
Jamie Wilson, Melissa Rivera, Todd Shawgo and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
