Cases 61 - 70 of 309
Andrade v. Amarillo Plce Dept
as 20-11151
Defendant / Appellee:
Potter County Sheriff Department and Staff, District Attorney Office and Staff, Nancy Esparza, Potter County Clerk and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Noel Valdez Andrade
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv01703
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matheis v. CDCR et al
as 3:2020cv02100
Plaintiff:
Brian Thomas Matheis
Defendant:
R. Calvert, Kathleen Allison, CDCR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Evers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2020cv02265
Plaintiff:
Brian Thomas Evers
Interested Party:
SSA
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Harrison et al v. Phillips 66 Co et al
as 2:2020cv01199
Plaintiff:
Marc Rigmaiden, Brian Bilbo, Skipper Thomas, Jr and others
Defendant:
Phillips 66 Co, Westlake Chemical Corp, Phillips 66 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Wilson v. Mount Diablo Unified School, et al
as 20-16674
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTINE L. WILBURN, SEAN JAMES BIAS, STEPHANIE R.C. KANG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL GEARY WILSON
Brian Stark v. Daniel White
as 20-35722
Respondent / Appellee:
DANIEL WHITE
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRIAN THOMAS STARK
Michael Wilson v. Mount Diablo Unified School, et al
as 20-16537
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTINE L. WILBURN, SEAN JAMES BIAS, LEIGH LAW GROUP, P.C., LLG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL GEARY WILSON
Thomas v. Saul
as 3:2020cv01138
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Brian Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc
Frescas v. Potter County Sheriff Brian Thomas
as 2:2020cv00188
Respondent:
Potter County Sheriff Brian Thomas
Petitioner:
Roberto Frescas, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
