Cases 61 - 70 of 231
Robinson v. Young et al
as 5:2020cv00552
Respondent:
Warden S Young and Warden A Carter
Petitioner:
Dorothy Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00276
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00013
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oklahoma City City of v. 100 Foot Wide Continuous Extended Term Easement and Other Related Pump Station Continuous Extended Term Easements and rights-of-way for public utility water pipelines et al
as 5:2020cv00023
Defendant:
Delores Ann Springer, John Charles Tiger, Nancie Lou Longacres Warrior and others
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma City City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Brena v. M. Johnson, et al
as 6:2020cv00008
Defendant:
Carter County Sheriff Department, Joe Doe, Sgt. Coffee and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Brena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Taylor et al
as 5:2019cv01188
Defendant:
Ricardel Wilson, Gene Bradley, Ronnie Neal and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Alexander Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mohler v. Carter County Sheriff
as 6:2019cv00370
Plaintiff:
Philicia R. Mohler
Defendant:
Carter County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wade v. United States of America et al
as 4:2019cv00521
Defendant:
Laureate Institute, Tulsa County, Ryan Braschler and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gene Wade, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Graham v. Lone Grove, City of et al
as 6:2019cv00298
Defendant:
Robert Oldham, Gilbert Hensley, Carter County Board of County Commissioners and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carter v. Farris
as 6:2019cv00243
Petitioner:
Robert D. Carter
Respondent:
Tommy Sharp and Jim Farris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
