Cases 61 - 70 of 411
Charon v. USA et al
as 4:2020cv00073
Defendant:
Warden Cole, GEO Group Inc., SIS Madril and others
Plaintiff:
Iraelio Charon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nel v. Cole et al
as 4:2020cv00067
Defendant:
FNU Portillo, B. Collins, FNU Madrill and others
Plaintiff:
Jan Abraham Nel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foshee et al v. Bay Correctional & Rehab Facility et al
as 1:2020cv00375
Plaintiff:
Ray Hill, Floyd Foshee and Reginald I Parker
Defendant:
FNU Cannelli, Bay Correctional & Rehab Facility, FNU Briscoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mury v. Rodgers et al
as 4:2020cv02897
Defendant:
Lt Reginald Rodgers, Houston Police Department and Geo Corporation
Plaintiff:
Alan Joseph Mury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Valdez v. GEO International Management, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00184
Defendant:
Mark Dunning Industries, Inc., GEO International Management, LLC and Mark Dunning Industries
Plaintiff:
Jesus Valdez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Ayers v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2020cv02297
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General, The Geo Group, Inc., Office of the Texas Attorney General and others
Plaintiff:
Avery L Ayers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yassine v. GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00042
Defendant:
Bobby Thompson and GEO Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Hussein Ali Yassine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gozo v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2020cv00196
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Service List, GEO Group Inc and others
Petitioner:
Makusha Gozo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Garcia v. GEO Group
as 5:2020cv00097
Plaintiff:
Armando De La Cruz Garcia and Armando Garcia-Delacruz
Defendant:
GEO Group, S. Lawson, Ricky Hamby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
