Cases 61 - 70 of 291
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01881
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2019cv01082
Defendant:
Gary L Lumpkin, FNU Williams, FNU Henry and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome A. David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRAPPS v. FONBAN et al
as 4:2020cv00021
Defendant:
CARTER, J VANN, D GREGORY and others
Plaintiff:
ALANDER CRAPPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2019cv20840
Plaintiff:
NATALIE R. HILL
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROTHERS v. PSP et al
as 2:2019cv01303
Defendant:
NESHANNOCK POLICE, TPR. SHAWN KING, TPR. ROMAN SHABLESKY and others
Plaintiff:
TIYONDA BROTHERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
David v. Savage et al
as 5:2019cv00789
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Edmond Police Department, Kathryn Savage and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome A. David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv20286
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP, MCKESSON CORP and MERCK & CO INC
Plaintiff:
HOWARD R. HILL and ANNE M. HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HILL et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 3:2019cv18180
Plaintiff:
ANNE M HILL, HOWARD R HILL, HOWARD R. HILL and others
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME, MCKESSON CORP., MERCK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. Blankenship et al
as 4:2019cv03103
Defendant:
Sgt Scott, Sgt Blankenship, Sgt Cooley and others
Plaintiff:
Gerry R Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Reinhardt v. Hamlin et al
as 1:2019cv00892
Defendant:
Kathleen A. Meehan, Arlan Harrell, Brad R. Hill and others
Plaintiff:
David Michael Reinhardt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
